Over 10,000 legitimate websites have been compromised and now have a javascript link that will direct visitors to a malicious website hosted on 2117966.net. The malicious website attempts to exploit the vulnerability described in MS06-014 MS07-004, MS06-067, MS06-057and a number of ActiveX vulnerabilities.
Successful exploitation result in the installation of a password-stealing malicious program that attempts to steal the logon credentials from websites and online games.
Block 2117966.net at your web proxy.
Inspect your web proxy logs for visitors to 2117966.net. This will indicate who is potentially exposed. Check these systems to verify that their patches are up-to-date. Systems that are successfully compromised will begin sending traffic to 61.188.39.175
(Source: http://www.shadowserver.org/wiki/pmwiki.php?n=Calendar.20080313). Search your proxy logs for systems generating those requests and reimage the infected machines.
A properly-patched system should not be at-risk from this attack. It is recommended to use a browser that does not support ActiveX. Use of javascript controls such as NoScript are also effective.
The CSS Security Team as Microsoft has released details on how the code was injected into the servers. It's an automated script that exploits poor input-checking code in the ASP page.
http://blogs.technet.com/neilcar/archive/2008/03/14/anatomy-of-a-sql-injection-incident.aspx
A more rigorous description and how to protect your ASP from SQL injection is available here:
http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2006/09/30/Tip_2F00_Trick_3A00_-Guard-Against-SQL-Injection-Attacks.aspx
Update: Added additional exploit information
Update: Clarify that shadowserver is not the endpoint of the malicious traffic-- they provided that malware analysis (thanks guys)
Update: this was misidentified as an iframe injection when in fact it was a javascript link on the altered ASP pages.
Update: MS fills in the blanks on how the code was injected.
Anyone come across this ?
On the assumption that this is a possible attack vector, wouldn't an immediate response advice be to disable site search caching on your website search software pending further investigation ?