Diary

 

June 2007, Microsoft Patch Tuesday Overview.
Share |
Published: 2007-06-12,
Last Updated: 2007-06-13 17:54:21 UTC
by Johannes Ullrich (Version: 4)
0 comment(s)

Overview of the June 2007 Microsoft patches and their status.

# Affected Contra Indications Known Exploits Microsoft rating ISC rating(*)
clients servers
MS07-030 Vulnerabilities in Microsoft Visio Could Allow Remote Code Execution.
Visio 2002
Visio 2003

CVE-2007-0934
CVE-2007-0936		 KB 927051 No known exploits Important Critical Important
MS07-031 Vulnerability in Schannel Could Allow Remote Code Execution
Windows 2000
Windows XP
Windows Server 2003

CVE-2007-2218		 KB 935840 Exploit (PoC) Critical Critical Critical
MS07-032 Vulnerability in Windows Vista Could Allow Information Disclosure
Windows Vista

CVE-2007-2229		 KB 931213 No known exploits Moderate Less Urgent Less Urgent
MS07-033 Cumulative Security Update for Internet Explorer
Internet Explorer

CVE-2007-0218
CVE-2007-1750
CVE-2007-1751
CVE-2007-1752
CVE-2007-2222
CVE-2007-3027		 KB 933566 Exploit Critical Critical Important
MS07-034 Cumulative Security Update for Outlook Express and Windows Mail
Outlook Express (XP, 2003)
Windows Mail (Vista)

CVE-2007-2111
CVE-2007-1658
CVE-2007-2225
CVE-2007-2227		 KB 929123 No known exploits Critical Critical Important
MS07-035 Vulnerability in Win32 API Could Allow Remote Code Execution
Windows 2000
Windows XP
Windows Server 2003

CVE-2007-2219		 KB 935839 No known exploits Critical Critical Critical

 

We will update issues on this page as they evolve.
We appreciate updates
US based customers can call Microsoft for free patch related support on 1-866-PCSAFETY
(*): ISC rating
  • We use 4 levels:
    • PATCH NOW: Typically used where we see immediate danger of exploitation. Typical environments will want to deploy these patches ASAP. Workarounds are typically not accepted by users or are not possible. This rating is often used when typical deployments make it vulnerable and exploits are being used or easy to obtain or make.
    • Critical: Anything that needs little to become "interesting" for the dark side. Best approach is to test and deploy ASAP. Workarounds can give more time to test.
    • Important: Things where more testing and other measures can help.
    • Less Urgent: Typically we expect the impact if left unpatched to be not that big a deal in the short term. Do not forget them however.
  • The difference between the client and server rating is based on how you use the affected machine. We take into account the typical client and server deployment in the usage of the machine and the common measures people typically have in place already. Measures we presume are simple best practices for servers such as not using outlook, MSIE, word etc. to do traditional office or leisure work.
  • The rating is not a risk analysis as such. It is a rating of importance of the vulnerability and the perceived or even predicted threat for affected systems. The rating does not account for the number of affected systems there are. It is for an affected system in a typical worst-case role.
  • Only the organization itself is in a position to do a full risk analysis involving the presence (or lack of) affected systems, the actually implemented measures, the impact on their operation and the value of the assets involved.
  • All patches released by a vendor are important enough to have a close look if you use the affected systems. There is little incentive for vendors to publicize patches that do not have some form of risk to them.
Keywords:
0 comment(s)

Comments

Login here to post a comment. Diary Archive